Joe Fitzgerald of the Boston Herald tells us that we should not be afraid to call evil by its name.  The whole government strategy, starting with Bush but amplified greatly by Obama, is not to broadly brush Muslims with the terrorist paint.   In past examples, we surely put it out straight.  We didn't say that all Germans and Japanese were bad but we also worried about where their allegiances were.  What we knew was that the Axis Powers were bad and their people, unfortunately, were part of that evil, not individually but as a people.   Our winning of WWII didn't cause us to torture every citizen of the Axis; instead we gave and loaned their new governments tons of money so that they could survive and build back their civilization.   We didn't hate individual Russians in the Cold War, but as a people, they were represented by horrible leadership that had taken a proud people to the depths of despair with communism.   So we fought communism and if some of their people got mixed up, we couldn't help it.  The important issue was for the free world to win.   That same scenario is happening with Muslims.  We are in a war with Islam, not individual people but with that whole segment of people who, whether by choice or not, are part of an evil.  We must call Islam evil as its goal is to end the freedoms for the rest of us.  It is too bad that the brush of Islam paints all their followers but it is up to their people to change the thrust, not us.  We just need to fight the ideology; freedom will always win. 

Mark Steyn writes about the attempted beheading in London.  If we don't soon recognize evil when it happens in broad daylight, not in some far-away backwater of a country, but right in London, then we deserve the consequences.  It is not the people who are to blame.  It is the leaders who think the right way to treat violence is better understanding.  That is crap.   There is no way to understand evil.   It is what it is and the sooner we attack evil wherever it appears, the better. 

Murdock explains either a policy of intentionally harming America or absolute incompetence whereby the Obama administration and Homeland Security Secretary Napalitano released thousands of illegal immigrants some with extensive criminal history.   Murdock lists some of the criminal backgrounds of these people.  I can see no way that the Obama folks could be that incompetent. Everything they do is politically motivated.  Maybe it was to get back at Republicans for the sequester (Obama's, by the way) or to show their sympathy to illegals or maybe simply to destroy America.   In any case, they are getting the job done, much to the disadvantage of the American people. 

Of course he does, and thank goodness.   The AP says that a Federal Judge ruled that Arpaio's office racially profiled by focusing on Latinos on immigration patrols.  You are in Arizona and your job is to stop illegal immigration.  Who in hell would you start looking for?  Norwegians with blond hair?   No, Latinos.  Who else would risk life and limb to illegally enter the United States from Mexico?   Well, maybe a few terrorists but mostly Latinos.  

Greenfield explains the two ways to get to socialism and hence tyranny.  Violent revolution was the preferred way of Marx.  H.G. Wells was satisfied with the long haul, 50 or 100 years.  But either way, liberty is destroyed. Socialism is liberty-destroying.  If the state knows what's "best" for the people, it can only accomplish that by taking away liberty and doing that by force, hence tyranny.   It has to be.  Obama and his ObamaCare is a major step along this path of peaceful revolution, to tyranny. 

N. Korea 'snubbed' in Beijing, caves to Chinese demands on nuke talks

 

The mail came and no response from the Secretary of Homeland Security.  See this link.